|
What does
the contract say about shared governance rights at the
program, unit, and university levels?
Article
27.1 of the AAUP/UC contract states the following (emphasis
here added):
The variety
and complexity of tasks performed by institutions of higher
education produces an interdependence among constituent
elements of the University.
Adequate communication is therefore essential, and there must
be full opportunity for appropriate joint planning and
effort.
Joint
effort and shared responsibility for governance will take a
variety of forms, as situations require. Initiative may
emerge at one time or another from all institutional
components, and differences in the weight of each voice will
vary according to the matter at hand and the defined
responsibilities of each constituent element.
Shared responsibility for governance is based upon mutual
trust and respect for diverse interests and perspectives and
is an iterative and consultative process.
To be effective, shared governance clearly defines roles,
scope of authority, and responsibility for decision-making
among faculty governance bodies and university
administrators.
Effective shared governance also requires joint
responsibility for timely implementation.
Outside of
the contract, these ideals are further explained in the AAUP
Policy “Statement on Government of Colleges and
Universities.” That Statement, first issued in 1966, talks
of the difference in the weight of each voice being
determined by the responsibility that each University
component has for the particular matter at hand. It goes on
to detail those matters that are largely, or primarily,
faculty matters. You can read this Statement in a copy of
the “AAUP Redbook” or you can find it online at the National
AAUP website –
www.aaup.org.
What are
the areas over which faculty should retain primary
responsibility and decision-making power?
Per Article
27.2:
The Rules
of the Board recognize the Faculties of the colleges and
other units, vesting in them, subject to the approval of the
Board, the power to make their own regulations governing:
·
the
admission and exclusion of students (including, but not
limited to, articulation and scholarship agreements with
other institutions)
·
the courses
of instruction to be offered
·
grading
policy
·
recommendations for degrees, honors and prizes
·
other
fundamental areas of curriculum
·
and such
other matters as may be within their jurisdiction.
What are
the areas over which faculty should have significant input
into the decision-making process?
Per Article
27.2: “They [the faculty] shall also be entitled to share
significantly in the responsibilities for program
development, program review, department review, and
department and college reorganization” (emphasis added).
What are my
rights to control curriculum and other works produced while
I am a faculty member at the UC? Do I retain copyright to
these works?
The AAUP/UC
contract does not directly address issues of copyright and
curriculum or other works produced by faculty. The issue is
addressed, however, by the University’s Copyright Policy
(see
http://www.uc.edu/trustees/rules/RuleDetail.asp?ID=84),
which is incorporated by reference in Article 34.2 of the
contract.
This policy does not change the traditional relationship
between the University and authors of textbooks and other
scholarly and artistic works. Unless the production of such
materials is subject to paragraphs (B)(2) to (B)(4) of this
rule, the University disclaims ownership of copyrights in
textbooks, monographs, papers, articles, musical
compositions, works of art and artistic imagination,
unpublished manuscripts, dissertations, theses, popular
nonfiction, novels, poems and the like that are created by
its faculty, staff and students.
The major exceptions are: (1) materials whose production
involve use of
“significant University resources.” Significant resources
would not normally involve such things as office and
library facilities, clerical support, data processing and
word processing, or use of storage space; or (2) materials
expected to generate revenue—for these, a prior written
copyright agreement should be executed to clarify ownership
rights to future use and income.
Faculty members unable to resolve concerns in the department
or college should consult the AAUP staff, and may need to
consult the Vice President for Research to determine whether
a written copyright agreement is needed.
The AAUP’s long-standing principles on this issues are
described in Donna Euben’s “Distance Learning and
Intellectual Property: Ownership and Related Faculty Rights
and Responsibilities” (see AAUP website at
http://www.aaup.org/Legal/info%20outlines/legdl.htm).
What is a
department/unit faculty’s role in hiring of new colleagues?
Per Article
6.1.2, “the appointment of a Faculty Member to an academic
unit shall normally be based on a recommendation initiated
within and approved by the Faculty of that academic unit
using procedures development within the academic unit.” See
this article for further details on the shared governance
rights of the Dean, the Provost, and the faculty in new
faculty hires.
What is a
department/unit faculty’s role in the decision to close an
academic program or unit?
Article 29
of the AAUP/UC contract outlines in detail the shared
governance rights of the faculty in decision-making process
leading to the closure of an academic program or unit
that will lead to termination of tenured faculty.
Termination
of academic programs or units which do not involve
termination of faculty nevertheless still entail shared
governance rights under Article 27.2: “They [the faculty]
shall also be entitled to share significantly in the
responsibilities for program development, program
review, department review, and department and college
reorganization” (emphasis added).
What is the
process for granting emeritus status to retired faculty?
The UC
Board of Trustees rules state that the procedure for
granting emeritus status to retired faculty is identical to
the process for hiring new faculty; that is, a committee of
the academic unit’s faculty considers the matter and makes a
recommendation to the Dean. That recommendation is then
forwarded to the Provost and the Board of Trustees for final
approval.
Back to the FAQ Main Page
Home
|